Topic: WorldNetDaily
After all these years of being proven wrong, WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah still can't let go of his 2020 election truther fantasies. He huffed in his May 10 column:
The Democrats don't seem very concerned that they will inevitably lose the 2024 presidential election – probably because they plan to cheat again.
That makes me wonder what they have up their sleeve. Is Joe Biden actually running? Is Kamala Harris actually running? Will there be a late surprise from Michelle Obama? Or are they depending on China for another pandemic? How about another indictment of Donald Trump? They're not yet giving anything away.
[...]
Biden has made a mess of the economy. He made a mess of the Afghan withdrawal. He's made a mess of the border. He's made a mess of everything. Some 48% of Democrats don't even want him to run again.
So, what does he do for an encore to save his illegitimate administration? Or will he just lose in 2024 fair and square with Trump on the verge of a seismic victory – even an electoral realignment?
Will it be a "2000 Mules" replay? The Dems are just playing cool for now – just too cool. They keep arresting more and more Jan. 6 bystanders and calling them "insurrectionists." They keep indicting Trump on bogus charges. They make a mockery of our two-party state, playing their advantage with media, hyping Big Tech, using the Deep State and turning America into a laughingstock. And now Tucker Carlson has been summarily dismissed as the nation's highest-rated anchorman by Fox News.
No wonder Biden isn't worried. Somehow the fix is in. That's what he is thinking in his obviously cognitively challenged state.
If Farah thinks "2000 Mules" is credible, that nobody was violent at the Capitol riot or that Trump never committed any crimes, it's clear who the real "cognitively challenged" person is here.
Farah was still at in his May 22 column:
Google, Facebook, Bing and the "mainstream media" insist that real Americans shouldn't even whisper that elections were rigged.
It's become naïve. It's superstitious to be talking about vote fraud – the one thing you can't discuss about elections. Of course, we know it has not always been this way.
Democrats, who accuse Republicans uniquely of harping on the 2020 election, forget all the times they questioned previous races – including the 2016 presidential race, which Hillary Clinton lost. They even try to block out of our minds all the times the U.S. fixed foreign elections as well.
The U.S. is no stranger to interfering in the elections of other countries. Back in 2016, in fact, the Los Angeles Times featured one professor's database citing 81 different attempts by the United States to subvert foreign elections in a range of countries. No one questioned that rhetoric, let alone Big Tech, back then.
Of course, that was then and this is now.
Back then, it was President Barack Obama who slapped Russia with new penalties for meddling in the U.S. presidential election, kicking out dozens of suspected spies and imposing banking restrictions on five people and four organizations the administration says were involved.
The CIA accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 presidential election by hacking into Democratic and Republican computer networks and selectively releasing emails. There was never any proof offered.
Actually, there is much more proof of 2016 Russian hacking with the goal to influence the 2016 election than there is that the 2020 election included massive amounts of voting fraud (which is to say, virtually none).
After an irrelevant diversion into U.S. attempts to influence foreign elections, Farah decided to blame Barack Obama for this nonexistent voting fraud because he and Biden are "still in charge of the Deep State throughout 2020 and still today":
Do you recall Zuckerbucks? Did you watch "2000 Mules"? Remember, these are the people who have no shame calling fellow Americans the greatest threat America faces. They're telling you just what they think. They were telling you when they coalesced around Joe Biden in the late stages of the election of 2020.
Yes, it was Obama who did this to us, again. I wonder what he has planned for 2024?
Why, yes, we do recall "Zuckerbucks" -- which means we remember that any election office could have gotten that money if they had simply requested it. The fact that some election offices used that money to reach out to voters and help make it easier for them to vote during a pandemic does not mean that money "stole" the election. It is not illegal to want more people to vote, and Farah is lying by suggesting "Zuckerbucks" were an attempt to steal the election.
But then, no amount of evidence will dissuade dead-enders like Farah from their fantasies. It also shows who among us really has cognitive issues.
