ConWebBlog: The Weblog of ConWebWatch

your New Media watchdog

ConWebWatch: home | archive/search | about | primer | shop

Friday, May 2, 2008
Newsmax Joins Obama Guilt-By-Association Smear Parade
Topic: Newsmax

It's not just WorldNetDaily and Accuracy in Media hurling guilt-by-association smears against Barack Obama. From a May 2 Newsmax article:

At a press conference during his visit to New Delhi on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, asked what he thought the result of the U.S. presidential election would be, replied, "We don't interfere in the other countries' affairs but we think that the American nation seek profound changes in their country."

Ahmadinejad's answer was the second reported instance in which a high Iranian official, when asked about the U.S. presidential contest, has used the word "change" or "changes" in his answer.

Experts on Iranian political discourse believe that the officials' choice of words is intended to be a reference to Democratic contender Barack Obama's campaign theme, "Change We Can Believe In," and to thereby signal that relations between Tehran and Washington will improve if Obama is elected. Obama has stated his willingness to meet with Ahmadinejad.

[...]

At a Tehran press conference on March 10, 2008, an Iranian reporter asked Seyed Mohammad Ali Hosseini, vice minister of foreign affairs of Iran and spokesman of Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which U.S. presidential candidate Iran would support. Hosseini replied, "Iran would not support any candidates in the U.S. presidential campaign."

He continued, "But the nations of the world are fed up with America's warmongering policies and we demand these change."

Observers in Tehran note that Hosseini has a reputation for choosing his words carefully. An Iranian analyst said, "Hosseini is considered an expert on American affairs. He would not have used the word 'change' unless it was his intention to signal that the Iranian regime prefers that the next U.S. president be Mr. Obama."

Note that there is no named source -- the "Experts on Iranian political discourse," "Observers in Tehran" and the "Iranian analyst" are all anonymous, if they exist at all. Newsmax is hiding behind this anonymity to make a claim it has no factual evidence to support: that Iranian leaders explicitly support Obama.

Also note the stilted writing style (such as full dates), which strongly suggests Newsmax copied this from some unknown source. It may have come from a spam email for all we know; Newsmax has treated spam as fact before.

And you thought Aaron Klein's Obama smears lacked substance ...


Posted by Terry K. at 1:10 PM EDT
Updated: Friday, May 2, 2008 4:02 PM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older

Bookmark and Share

Get the WorldNetDaily Lies sticker!

Find more neat stuff at the ConWebWatch store!

Buy through this Amazon link and support ConWebWatch!

Support This Site

« May 2008 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Bloggers' Rights at EFF
Support Bloggers' Rights!

News Media Blog Network

Add to Google