Topic: WorldNetDaily
WorldNetDaily continued its longtime efforts to rebrand anti-LGBT conversion therapy -- this time as nothing more than "everyday conversations" -- in an Oct. 21 article:
LGBT activists for several years already have been on the warpath against "conversion therapy."
They contend that counselors or therapists talking with people, especially minors, about NOT pursuing any transient gender confusion ideologies must be criminal.
Actually, such therapy and counseling has helped hundreds, if not thousands, of people, including those young people who mostly resolved their issues comfortably in their birth gender if they are not led astray by adults.
The crackdown move has been evident both in the United Kingdom and the United States, and court fights continue over the disagreement.
But now the Christian Institute, in the U.K., is warning government officials they cannot use that theory to make everyday conversations illegal.
In an online announcement, the organization confirmed its readiness to take legal action against the Westminster government if it adopts the anti-"conversion therapy" ideology, because it impacts everyday religious practice.
The statement came on the heels of press speculation that the government is ready to move ahead with a draft bill that would ban such conversations.
Unruh again ignores the fact that conversaion therapy tends to be involuntary and coercive.Inmstead, Unruh portray being LGBT as a "lifetyle" something that people must be "converted" from:
The issue is important to those caught up in the LGBT ideology, as they repeatedly claim that they have those lifestyles because they were born that way.
However, counseling that, over and over, has proven effectively in ridding individuals of unwanted same-sex attractions undermines that argument entirely.
Activist Jayne Ozanne, in fact, has demanded that "gentle non-coercive prayer" be made criminal.
That statement is taken out of context from a longer statement in which she pointed out that is no such thing as "non-coercive prayer" to change sexual orentation:
Jayne Ozanne, a prominent campaigner on LGBT+ rights and the editor of ViaMedia.News, said: “I’m very grateful to Bishop David for his clear support for a ban, although I would strongly refute that ‘gentle non-coercive prayer’ should be allowed. All prayer that seeks to change or suppress someone’s innate sexuality or gender identity is deeply damaging and causes immeasurable harm, as it comes from a place – no matter how well meaning – that says who you are is unacceptable and wrong.”
All conversion “therapy” was coercive, she added. “We know that this occurs in numerous C of E churches and many other faith settings – indeed there are evangelical organisations that openly advocate it. This must stop before more lives are ruined and sadly even lost.”
Because Unruh has no interest in that larger discussion and only wants to be a stenographer for an anti-LGBT group, he omitted that context.
